The Difference Between All-Wheel Drive and Four-Wheel Drive

Written by E. Yuko

The terms are sometimes used interchangeably, but they're not the same thing.

 Some of the terminology you come across in ads for new or used cars is pretty straightforward, like the year, make, model, mileage, and category of the vehicle. However, other terms—specifically, “four-wheel-drive” (4WD or 4x4) and “all-wheel-drive” (AWD)—can be a bit more confusing. Here’s what to know about the difference between the two.

What’s the difference between four-wheel-drive and all-wheel-drive?

Given that most cars, SUVs, and non-commercial trucks have four wheels, you might assume that 4WD and AWD are the same thing. But that would be too simple. Complicating matters even further is the fact that some manufacturers come up with their own names for driving systems, like 4MATIC (Mercedes-Benz) and xDrive (courtesy of BMW).

Plus, the two systems tend to appeal to the same group of consumers: Those who live places where rain, snow, and other weather impacts road conditions, and/or people who plan to drive off-road.

Here are some of the main differences between 4WD and AWD, according to Kelley Blue Book and Carmax:

Four-wheel-drive

  • Designed for slippery, loose, or rugged surfaces
  • Splits power evenly between the front and rear wheels 
  • Typically uses rear wheels on paved roads
  • Excels on steep inclines
  • More towing capability than AWD
  • Poor fuel economy
  • Most pickup trucks use it

All-wheel-drive

  • Designed for on-road use
  • Vehicle automatically shifts power between the front and rear wheels to achieve optimal traction 
  • Provides added traction in bad weather
  • Costs more upfront, but adds value if you sell
  • More fuel-efficient than 4WD
  • Used on cars and minivans

There’s more to know, and this guide from Kelley Blue Book has additional information on each system, including what to consider when shopping for a new vehicle.

Large FIRE strikes downtown Auburn, WA

Giovanni Di Quattro, owner of the Rainbow Café, watched nervously as firefighters battled the three-alarm fire billowing out of the Heritage Building at 134 E. Main St., late Tuesday afternoon, just east of his restaurant.

It was one of his cooks who discovered the fire, which ignited in a laundry room of the two-story building.

“I just hope they can keep the fire from spreading,” Di Quattro said.

Eric Robertson, Valley Regional Fire Authority administrator, said: “We’ve been told that it started as a dryer fire. They’ve put an immense amount of water on it to put it out. And as you can see … they’re trying to ensure it doesn’t spread to the next building.”

The 21,000-square-foot, historic Auburn Heritage Building, constructed in 1921, according to the King County Assessor’s Office., is of mixed use, part residential, with apartments and commercial spaces but it was burning east, west, front and center. The building housed 35 residential units and 12 businesses.

Read more & see pictures…